The General Assembly of the United Nations continued it debate on the future of Palestine on Tuesday (27 November) afternoon.
GV: General Assembly of United Nations
LV: Chinese Permanent United Nations' Representative Chen Chu speaking in Chinese PAN TO General Assembly
SV: Dr Hazem Nuseibeh Permanet Representative to UN from Jordan addressing Assembly in English.
LV: Israeli delegation taking notes.
SV: Dr. Esmat Abdel Meguid, Permanet Representative to UN from Egypt addressing Assembly in Arabic.
TRANSCRIPT: SEQ. 3: DR. NUSEIBEH: "Jordan has found itself with no alternative but to reject the Camp David accords because of very substantive and inescapable considerations. The reasons are manifold but can be summed up as follows: One, the framework prescribed for a solution to the occupied territories, foremost of which is Jerusalem, is a priori flawed, in as much as it specifically tolerates a perpetuation of military occupation indefinitely."
Script is copyright Reuters Limited. All rights reserved
Background: The General Assembly of the United Nations continued it debate on the future of Palestine on Tuesday (27 November) afternoon. Earlier, delegates had heard the Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations accuse the organisation of compromising its integrity by supporting the aims of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) and the Arab hard-line 'reductionist' stats. He described the Camp David accord between Egypt and Israel as the only real chance for a lasting Middle East peace settlement.
SYNOPSIS: Later speakers in the debate opposed this Israeli assessment of the situation.
The Chinese Permanet Representative to the United Nations, Mr Chen Chu shifted the focus of the debate from the single question of the Palestinians living in the occupied territories, to the global significance of the Middle East conflict. He accused the United States and the Soviet Union of exploiting the situation to satisfy their own interests. Mr Chen said the United States was shielding Israel because it wanted to retain its influence in the region and the Soviet Union was pursuing policies of expansionism and infiltration. The next speaker, Dr Hazem Nuseibeh of Jordan, outlined his country's opposition to the Camp David agreement.
Speaking in defence of the Camp David accord, Egyptian permanet representative Dr Esmat Abdel Meguid, denied that the provisions made for the Palestinians in the agreement were inadequate. He said the Palestinians' future formed the central issue of the accord and was vital to the establishment of peace in the area.