• Short Summary

    The United Nations and the international Court at the Hague continue to argue the question of who should rule the territory of south West Africa.

  • Description

    1.
    GV & CU Desert (2 shots)
    0.05

    2.
    SV Separation between diamonds and stones in production belt (2 shots)
    0.08

    3.
    CU Picking up diamonds amongst stones
    0.11

    4.
    CU Tray of diamonds
    0.13

    5.
    CU German settler speaks, (SOUND ON FILM)
    0.40

    6.
    GV Pan school
    0.45

    7.
    CU ZOOM OUT student putting the shot
    0.53

    8.
    CU Anglican bishop speaks (SOUND ON FILM)
    1.18

    9.
    Aerial View African village
    1.22

    10.
    SV African hut
    1.26

    11.
    SV & CU Africans seated on ground outside hut (2 shots)
    1.31

    12.
    SV African women and children walking between wooden Zence (2 shots)
    1.39

    13.
    SV African men jumping over each other
    1.44

    14.
    CU Herero tribe leader speaks (SOUND ON FILM)
    1.46

    15.
    GV Pan building and traffic in Windhoek
    2.24

    16.
    SV & CU Africans and white people in street (3 shots)
    2.32

    17.
    GV Cows in farm (2 shots)
    2.42

    18.
    CU Pan and SV African women carrying children singing African song (2 shots)
    2.59


    TRANSCRIPT:



    GERMAN SETTLER: "The United Nations cannot run this country for the simple reason that they've never on any project anywhere in the world have run anything to any success, whatsoever. Whereas South Africa has proved to the inhabitants of this country that they have run us in such a way that progress and wealth is developing, or increasing, I would say."



    ANGLICAN BISHOP: "Do you realize what it is to be an African in South Africa today? It means to say that you have to go with a pass. You are not allowed freedom of travel. You are not allowed free choice in where you live. You are hunted, and you are hounded. Granted that Africa is a poor continent, and granted that our people are better off even under white dictatorship. But how much more better off they would be, who can say, until the reality happens."



    HERERO LEADER: "I am optimistic because the Germans, for instance, had colonies in Africa and were stronger than South Africa, but they were ousted. Similarly the British also had many colonies in Africa, and they are stronger than South Africa, but they were ousted. The French too had colonies in Africa, but they were ousted. They were stronger than South Africa. So I cannot see how a small country like S-Africa can cling to a country which does not belong to her, in defiance of the whole world."




    Initials OS/1646 JL/OS/1820



    Script is copyright Reuters Limited. All rights reserved

    Background: The United Nations and the international Court at the Hague continue to argue the question of who should rule the territory of south West Africa. Basically the problem comes down to whether or not South Africa should be allowed to maintain the present control over the area. After World War I, South Africa took it over from the original German colonists. South Africa administered the territory in Britain's name under a mandate from the League of Nations, and South Africa continues to rule the territory.

    South West Africa covers an area larger than Britain and France put together, with about two-thirds f the land covered by barren desert. It is this desert, or rather what lies beneath it, that provides the key to the desirability of the territory. The land has revealed one of the richest deposits of minerals in the world. Most importantly some of the finest diamonds are mined in South West Africa, but it is South African money that supports the mining industry. For that matter, nearly the entire economy is dependent on South Africa, which supplies 90% of South West Africa's imports. Aside from the economic control, South Africa virtually rules South West Africa politically, and recently withdrew most of the remaining power of the local administration in Windhoek.

    Out of a population of something less than one million, 8 out of 10 are Africans. The remainder is primarily comprised of whites who are either descendants of German colonists or emigrants from South Africa. Under the original mandate, South Africa was required to promote the social progress and well being of all the inhabitants; but the mandate also permitted South Africa to apply its own laws. One consequence of this is that the Africans in South West Africa live with an apartheid the same as in South Africa. This means pass laws, permits, separate townships, and detention without trial. South Africa has poured a great deal of money into education programmes, but three times as much is spent per capita on the white population. Still, South Africa subsidises most of the food, rail lines, roads, and communication networks in South West Africa. So, aside from the moral question of South Africa's right to remain in The territory, the United Nations and International World Court must also face the economic realities. South Africa herself has suggested a plebiscite on the continuation of South African rule, but so far no action has been taken.

  • Tags

  • Data

    Film ID:
    VLVA1IEKBJ3JLIU6AZVIE9BG7U3PG
    Media URN:
    VLVA1IEKBJ3JLIU6AZVIE9BG7U3PG
    Group:
    Reuters - Source to be Verified
    Archive:
    Reuters
    Issue Date:
    16/04/1971
    Sound:
    Unknown
    HD Format:
    Available on request
    Stock:
    Black & White
    Duration:
    00:02:59:00
    Time in/Out:
    /
    Canister:
    N/A

Comments (0)

We always welcome comments and more information about our films.
All posts are reactively checked. Libellous and abusive comments are forbidden.

Add your comment